<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diagnosing Stack Overflow Faults in ASP.NET Production Environments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tatham.oddie.com.au/2009/07/04/diagnosing-stack-overflow-faults-in-asp-net-production-environments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tatham.oddie.com.au/2009/07/04/diagnosing-stack-overflow-faults-in-asp-net-production-environments/</link>
	<description>Enter the Tatrix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:33:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tatham Oddie</title>
		<link>http://blog.tatham.oddie.com.au/2009/07/04/diagnosing-stack-overflow-faults-in-asp-net-production-environments/#comment-13925</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatham Oddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tatham.oddie.com.au/?p=327#comment-13925</guid>
		<description>Hi Jezza,

How would a 4.0 dump be any different? Loading SOS relative to the location of mscorwks ensures that you are loading the correct version architecture. I can&#039;t think of what other differences there would be?

Note that VS2010 also has very good support for crash dump analysis, which would remove the need for windbg in this scenario. Only adplus would have been required to capture the dump in the first place.


- Tatham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jezza,</p>
<p>How would a 4.0 dump be any different? Loading SOS relative to the location of mscorwks ensures that you are loading the correct version architecture. I can&#8217;t think of what other differences there would be?</p>
<p>Note that VS2010 also has very good support for crash dump analysis, which would remove the need for windbg in this scenario. Only adplus would have been required to capture the dump in the first place.</p>
<p>- Tatham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jezza</title>
		<link>http://blog.tatham.oddie.com.au/2009/07/04/diagnosing-stack-overflow-faults-in-asp-net-production-environments/#comment-13924</link>
		<dc:creator>Jezza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tatham.oddie.com.au/?p=327#comment-13924</guid>
		<description>Well done! Great article, debugging memory dumps is an art not a science. Good to see you follow Tess&#039;s blog. How about debugging .net 4.0 (beta 1) dumps Tatham? omg! Happy coding, Jezza</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done! Great article, debugging memory dumps is an art not a science. Good to see you follow Tess&#8217;s blog. How about debugging .net 4.0 (beta 1) dumps Tatham? omg! Happy coding, Jezza</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
